Today, I had a development experience that felt... calm. Productive. Almost too easy. I was working on a user asset management system, writing TypeScript functions with the help of my AI coding assistant, and everything just clicked. There were no mysterious bugs, no "it works on my machine" moments, and no integration hell.

This wasn't an accident. It was the result of a deliberate, layered development strategy I call the "LEGO Blocks" Methodology.

After countless projects spiraling into a mess of debugging sessions, I was tired of the usual cycle: build everything at once, hope it fits together, and then spend half the project time fixing the mess. This time, I built 25 functions—from file validation to AI content generation—with 100% test coverage and zero integration bugs.

Here’s how.

The Quicksand of Traditional Development

Most developers know this story all too well. It’s a tragedy in five acts:

  1. Assumptions: You write function B assuming function A (its dependency) will work as expected.
  2. The "Big Bang" Build: You wire everything together at once.
  3. Discovery: During testing (or worse, in production), you find that A and B don't play nicely.
  4. The Debugging Vortex: You spend ages trying to figure out if the problem is in A, B, or the way they interact.
  5. Technical Debt: You ship a fragile system, knowing a single change could bring the whole house of cards down.

The root cause is building on an unreliable foundation. If you can't completely trust your dependencies, you're building on quicksand.

The "LEGO Blocks" Methodology: Build on Bedrock

The core principle is deceptively simple: Every layer of your application must be 100% solid before you build the next one on top of it.

It’s just like LEGOs. You don't start building the second floor of a LEGO house before the first floor is finished and stable.

Phase 1: Dependency Mapping

Before writing a single line of code, I spent 30 minutes mapping out all 25 functions and their relationships. This created a clear, layered architecture.

  • Layer 1 (0 dependencies): Pure utility functions.
    • formatFileSize, generateAssetId, handleApiError
  • Layer 2 (depends on L1): Simple validation functions.
    • validateFileType, validateFileSize, validateKeywords
  • Layer 3 (depends on L1-2): More complex logic.
    • generateUniqueFileName, processSearchKeywords
  • Layer 4 (depends on L1-3): Business-specific rules.
    • validateRepeatSchedule, createRepeatTask
  • Layer 5 (depends on L1-4): Top-level API-facing functions.
    • uploadCharacterImage, getUserAssets

This map is your blueprint.

Phase 2: Layer-by-Layer Construction

This is where the discipline comes in. The non-negotiable rule: Never move to the next layer until the current one is bulletproof.

For each layer, the process is:

  1. Code: Write all the functions for that layer.
  2. Test: Create a comprehensive unit test suite covering every function and edge case.
  3. Validate: Run tests until you have 100% confidence and coverage.
  4. Proceed: Only then do you move to the next layer.

Phase 3: Confident Integration

By the time I reached Layer 5, the "integration" was trivial. Why? Because I could trust every single dependency my top-level functions were calling. The foundation was rock-solid. There were no surprises.

A Real-World Example: The File Validation System

Let's see how this works in practice.

Layer 1: The Foundation (0 Dependencies)

These are pure, self-contained utilities.

TypeScript

// Zero dependencies - a pure utility function
export function formatFileSize(sizeInBytes: number): string {
  if (sizeInBytes === 0) return '0 Bytes';
  const k = 1024;
  const sizes = ['Bytes', 'KB', 'MB', 'GB', 'TB'];
  const i = Math.floor(Math.log(sizeInBytes) / Math.log(k));
  return parseFloat((sizeInBytes / Math.pow(k, i)).toFixed(2)) + ' ' + sizes[i];
}

Layer 2: Building on Layer 1

This function can safely call formatFileSize because we've already proven it's flawless.

TypeScript

// Safely depends on a Layer 1 function
export function validateFileSize(file: File, maxSize: number) {
  if (file.size > maxSize) {
    return {
      success: false,
      // We can TRUST formatFileSize to work perfectly!
      error: `File size ${formatFileSize(file.size)} exceeds maximum`,
      fileSize: formatFileSize(file.size),
      maxSize: formatFileSize(maxSize)
    };
  }
  return { success: true };
}

Layer 3: Complex Logic with Total Confidence

This uploadFile function uses functions from Layers 1 and 2. I could focus entirely on the new logic, knowing the validations were already perfect.

TypeScript

// Confidently uses both Layer 1 and 2 functions
export async function uploadFile(file: File, type: string, userId: string) {
  // We KNOW these validation functions work. No need to second-guess them.
  const typeValidation = validateFileType(file, allowedTypes);
  const sizeValidation = validateFileSize(file, maxSize);

  if (!typeValidation.success) return typeValidation;
  if (!sizeValidation.success) return sizeValidation;

  // Now we can build complex logic on a solid foundation
  const uniqueFileName = generateUniqueFileName(file.name, userId);
  // ... rest of the upload implementation
}

The Controversial Part: My Testing Strategy

My testing process for this method is rigorous but clean. Once a layer's tests pass 100%, I do something unusual: I delete the test files.

Why delete tests? In this methodology, once a foundational layer is validated, it's treated as an immutable part of the system—like a built-in library function. The goal is to prove it's reliable once, then trust it completely. This keeps the final codebase lean and focused only on the application logic, not on re-testing foundations. This isn't for every project, but it reinforces the "trust the layer" mindset.

The results were crystal clear:

  • Layer 1 Tests: 13/13 passed ✅
  • Layer 2 Tests: 17/17 passed ✅
  • ...and so on for all 5 layers.

The final numbers don't lie:

  • 25 functions built across 5 dependency layers.
  • 0 integration bugs found in final testing.
  • ~50% less time spent on debugging.
  • Clean codebase with no orphaned test files.

The Key Benefits

This approach transformed more than just the code; it transformed the developer experience.

  • 😌 Psychological Safety: You can focus on the business logic at hand instead of constantly worrying if a dependency will break.
  • 🔍 Rapid Debugging: If a bug appears, you know it's in the current layer you're working on, not somewhere in the foundation.
  • 📖 Living Documentation: The layer structure itself becomes a powerful architectural document.
  • ⚙️ Fearless Refactoring: Need to optimize a Layer 1 function? Go for it. You know exactly what depends on it and can test the impact precisely.
  • 🤝 Team Scalability: Junior and senior developers can work on different layers simultaneously without stepping on each other's toes.

Addressing the Skeptics

"But this seems so much slower!"

It's slower at the very beginning, but we saved enormous amounts of time by eliminating nearly all debugging and integration work. It's a "go slow to go fast" strategy.

"Isn't this over-engineering?"

No. We built exactly what was needed, just in a deliberate, structured order. The complexity is managed, not created.

"It feels too rigid."

The structure provides freedom. Once the foundations are solid, you can build higher-level features with incredible speed and confidence.

When to Use the LEGO Method

This isn't a silver bullet, but it's incredibly effective in the right context.

Perfect for:

  • ✅ Complex systems with many interdependent parts.
  • ✅ Teams where reliability and maintainability are top priorities.
  • ✅ Long-term projects that will need to evolve.

Maybe skip it for:

  • ❌ Simple scripts or one-off prototypes.
  • ❌ Early-stage exploratory work where the design is still in flux.
  • ❌ Projects with very tight deadlines where some technical debt is acceptable.

Conclusion: Build to Last

The "LEGO Blocks" methodology is more than a technique; it's a mindset shift. It's about trading the chaotic rush of "build it all now" for the calm confidence of building on solid ground. By constructing our software layer by layer, we created a system where 25 different functions fit together perfectly on the first try.

In an industry where "it works on my machine" is still a common refrain, this approach offers a clear path toward truly robust and reliable software.

What's your experience with layered architectures or test-driven development? Have you found a method that brings you similar results? I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments.

Tags: #SoftwareArchitecture #TypeScript #TestDrivenDevelopment #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering

Tagged in:

SoftwareArchitecture TypeScript TestDrivenDevelopment CleanCode SoftwareEngineering